Working tools. Operational writeups. Evidence.

Build proof an employer can inspect.

These are not screenshot-only labs. Each project includes a working artifact, safe sample data, tests, limitations, an analyst writeup, and a short demonstration.

3First-cohort projects
6Evidence layers per project
80%Portfolio rubric pass mark
0Live targets or private data
01

threat_intel_hunter

Threat Intel CLI

Signal
Threat intelligence, API correlation, scoring, reporting
Evidence package
Working CLI change, safe fixtures, JSON report, tests, and analyst writeup
02

EventLogTutorialThriveDX

Event Log Dashboard

Signal
Telemetry, normalization, visualization, investigation
Evidence package
Synthetic event set, dashboard, verified timeline, and anomaly summary
03

SecureWatch

SecureWatch KQL Hunt Pack

Signal
Threat hunting, KQL, MITRE mapping, detection tuning
Evidence package
Four hunts, test fixtures, expected results, and false-positive notes

The review standard

A tool is not proof until the evidence holds up.

Every submission is scored for functionality, defender usefulness, evidence quality, communication, tuning, and professional packaging. A real secret, private data, unauthorized target, or live malware fails the safety gate before scoring.

100points
Portfolio artifact rubric

25 functionality · 20 defender usefulness · 20 evidence · 15 communication · 15 analysis · 5 packaging